SANJEEV KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/26948/2025 · 2025-07-28
Vikram D Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78098 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 78098 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:124889 Court No. - 76 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 26948 of 2025 Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.
2. The present application has been filed by applicants for quashing the entire criminal proceeding against applicants in Criminal Case No.1507 of 2024, (State Versus Sanjeev and others), arising out of Case Crime No.118 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, & 494 I.P.C., Police Station Dannahar, District Mainpuri, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Mainpuri as well as impugned charge sheet No.131 of 2023 dated 23.6.2023 submitted by Investigating Officer in Case Crime No. 118 of 2023 and cognizance order dated 20.6.2024 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mainpuri.
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the applicants states that he may be permitted to withdraw this application filed under Section 528 BNSS with liberty to file bail application before the court below.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants.
5. Under the circumstances, the present application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicants to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to enable the applicants to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. In case, the bail application is preferred by the applicants before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. While considering the bail application of the applicants, the court below shall keep in mind the principles of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773.
6. The application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 D. Tamang Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad