Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78085 (ALL)

SANJEEV KUMAR BANSAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/10784/2025 · 2025-07-30

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128191 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10784 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Bansal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Jeet Yeadav,Rajkumari Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shivendra Kumar Singh Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the selection by respondent no.3 (Uttar Pradesh Shiksha Seva Chayan Ayog) of one post of English subject of Upadhi Postgraduate College, Pilibhit. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the respondents to fill the one vacant post of English subject of Upadhi Postgraduate College, Pilibhit by transfer of the petitioner from Sri Varshaney Degree College, Aligarh. iii)Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to decide the representation dated 06.01.2025 (appended as Annexure no.8 to this writ petition) within a period specify by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri Santosh Kumar, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents and Sri Shivendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but they have not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents as well as Sri Shivendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 Director of Education, Higher Education, Uttar Pradesh, Prayagraj within a week. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad