Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78071 (KAR)

SRI RAVIKUMAR GOWDA v. R RAMANNA

WP/7955/2024 · 2025-11-19

S Vishwajith Shetty

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47672 WP No. 7955 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 7955 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI RAVIKUMAR GOWDA S/O LATE CHINNAGIRIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT B.S DODDI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 561 17 SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS. 1a. SMT. ANITHA KAVYA GOWDA W/O LATE RAVI KUMAR GOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 1b. VILOK RAJIV GOWDA S/O LATE RAVI KUMAR GOWDA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS. 1c. VIVAN KUMAR GOWDA S/O LATE RAVI KUMAR GOWDA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS AT B.S. DODDI KASABA HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI NATARAJ BABA K, ADV.) AND: 1. R. RAMANNA S/O LATE REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.24, NAGEGOWDANA PALYA, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD TALAGATTAPURA, BENGALURU SOUTH, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 560 062. 2. S. BASAVARAJU S/O SAMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47672 WP No. 7955 of 2024 R/AT NO.73, NAGEGOWDANA PALYA KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD TALAGATTAPURA, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU - 560 062. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRINATARAJ BABU K, ADV., FOR SRI K.C. RAVINDRA BABU, ADV., FOR R-2; R-1 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.02.2024 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KANAKAPURA, IN O S NO. 499/2021 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed. He has also filed a memo to the said effect. 2. The said submission and memo taken on record. The petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending I.A.No.1 of 2025 is therefore does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE NMS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24