IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 181/2025 Decided on:28.05.2025 Chhotu Ram …Petitioner. Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Dikkan Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the petition, respondents have complied with the judgment in question and vide order dated 21.04.2025 rejected the case of the petitioner. 2. In view of above, the contempt petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his surviving grievances, including the grievances against the consideration order, in accordance with law. Notices issued to the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes respondents are discharged. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 28, 2025(rohit)