Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78068 (PNJ)

RAM PHAL v. ROSHNI KAUR

RSA/569/2022 · 2025-04-08

Pankaj Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[253] [1] Ram Phal Roshni Kaur [2] Ram Phal Roshni Kaur Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] settled amica present appe [2] the appeals are [3] disposed off [4] case. 08.04.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-569 Date of Decision : Ram Phal versus Roshni Kaur RSA-705 Phal versus Roshni Kaur HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Manglesh Kumar, Advocate Advocate for the appellant(s) *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the dispute has been settled amicably between the parties and he has instructions present appeals. In view of the statement made by counsel appeals are dismissed as not pressed. All pending miscellaneous disposed off. Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected .04.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 569-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.04.2025 …Appellant ….Respondent 705-2022 (O&M) …Appellant ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for Mr. Shakti Mehta, ) in both the appeals. Counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the dispute has been ies and he has instructions not to press the made by counsel for the appellant(s), miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the dispute has been not to press the appellant(s), application(s), if any, stands Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.04.08 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document