Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7806 (MAD)

G.Sugumaran v. Anshul Mishra

CONT P/161/2025 · 2026-07-06

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.161 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.07.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Cont.P.No.161 of 2025 G.Sugumaran S/o. M.Govindan No. 26/40, Karnam Street, Mogappair West, Chennai 37. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Anshul Mishra Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Building No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore Chennai 600 008. 2. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Building, Chennai. [R2 impleaded vide order dated 29.04.2025] Contemnor(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent herein for his wilful disobedience and non-compliance of the orders of this Court dated 27.06.2023 made in W.P.No.8247 of 2022. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.161 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent : Mr.T.Gowthaman Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu for R2 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for State submits that in compliance of the impugned order, de-occupation notice was issued and the same was challenged in W.P.No.18899 of 2025, wherein, vide order dated 21.05.2025, this Court relegated the parties to file an appeal under Section 80A of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 within two weeks and till the disposal of such appeal by the Government, the de-occupation notice was kept in abeyance. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that appeal under Section 80-A has been filed and the same is yet to be decided. 3. In view of the above, nothing survives in the contempt __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.161 of 2025 petition. Accordingly, it is closed. 4. Petitioner is at liberty to pursue the remedy in accordance with law. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 06.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No kpl __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.161 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) Cont.P.No.161 of 2025 06.07.2026 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis