- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31587 CRL.P No. 2066 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2066 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MAHESHA @ PAPU AGED 26 YEARS S/O NANJUNDAIAH R/AT HONGANURU VILLAGE CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571117 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISHA A S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA CHAMARAJANGARA EAST POLICE STATION REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. SRI MAHADEVAIAH S/O LATE SOLUBUNDA MADAIAH AGED 66 YEARS R/AT HONGANURU VILLAGE CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA DIST-571117 Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31587 CRL.P No. 2066 of 2023 3. TEJASHWINI D/O NARASIMHAIAH W/O MAHESH AGED 22 YEARS R/AT HONGANURU VILLAGE CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA DIST-571117 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.LAKSHMAN, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CHARGE SHEET & PROCEEDINGS IN SPL.C.NO.183/2019 ARISING OUT OF FIR IN CR.NO.116/2019 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHAMARAJANAGARA FTC I (SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF CASES FILED UNDER POCSO ACT), REGISTERED BY THE CHAMARAJANAGARA EAST POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.366,376(n),504 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND SEC.4,6,8,12 AND 17 OF POCSO ACT AND SEC.75 OF J.J (CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner even at 4.08 p.m. Though it was submitted that matter is settled, the same is not reported. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31587 CRL.P No. 2066 of 2023 This matter is of the year 2023. Office objections are still pending. Vide order dated 04.08.2025, as a last chance, a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2