Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78040 (BOM)

SANDEEP SURESH VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER

WP/15793/2025 · 2025-11-27

Shri N J Jamadar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

914-WP15793-2025.DOC Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15793 OF 2025 Sandeep Suresh Vishwakarma ...Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra Sub-divisional Of5cer …Respondent Mr. Niranjan Mogre, a/w Sujay Gangal, for the Petitioner. Mr. Bapusaheb Dahiphale, AGP for State - Respondent. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 27th NOVEMBER, 2025 PC:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. The challenge in this petition is to an order passed by the Maintenance Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. 3. In view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Jagdish Pitambar Pawar vs. Pitambar Pundalik Pawar1 an appeal is maintainable at the instance of the children against an order passed by the Maintenance Tribunal. 4. The petition stands disposed with liberty to the petitioner to 5le an appeal before the Appellate Authority. 1 WP/36/2023 Aurangabad Bench of High Court at Bombay, dated 29/11/2023. 1/2 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2025.11.28 11:02:54 +0530 914-WP15793-2025.DOC 5. In the event an appeal is 5led by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority, within a period of one week, alongwith an application for interim relief, the Appellate Authority is requested to decide the application for interim relief as expeditiously as possible. 6. The petition stands disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2