Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7804 (RAJ)

VALLABH DASS SHARMA v. STATE ANDORS

CW/5626/2000 · 2025-09-17

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38052] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5626/2000 Vallabh Das Sharma S/o Late Shri Roop Kishor Sharma, aged about 61 years, Resident of Saharai Road, Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Panchayati RAj Department, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 3. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner 4. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary Education, Jaisalmer (Raj.) 5. The Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti, Sam District Jaisalmer (Rajasthan) 6. The Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sam, Headquarter Jaisalmer (Raj.) 7. The Director, Pension & Pensioners' Welfare Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur 8. The Joint Director, Pension Department, Regional Office, Jodhpur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anand Sharma for Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aditi Lodha on behalf of Mr. Rahul Lodha Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC with Mr. Saumil Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 17/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought in the original writ petition has already been granted [2025:RJ-JP:38052] (2 of 2) [CW-5626/2000] to him. Hence, no cause of action for pursuing the original writ petition survives. 2. However, the petitioner has filed one application for seeking amendment in the writ petition with a prayer which is altogether different from the earlier prayer, therefore, liberty may be granted to him to pursue the relief sought for in amendment application, by way of filing a fresh writ petition. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on accrual of fresh cause of action. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /4