- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46086-DB WA No. 1852 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT APPEAL NO. 1852 OF 2024 (SC-ST) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. T BANGARAPPA S/O BANGLI THIMMAIAH AGED AOUT 75 YEARS BEHIND PVTC SCHOOL GANDHINAGARA, CHALLAKERE 577522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 2. SRI T CHALLAKERAIAH S/O BANGLI THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS BEHIND PVTC SCHOOL GANDHINAGARA, CHALLAKERE 577522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 3. SRI. T MUNISWAMY S/O BANGLI THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS BEHIND PVTC SCHOOL GANDHINAGARA, CHALLAKERE 577522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT (BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZENSHIP IS NOT CLAIMED) …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46086-DB WA No. 1852 of 2024 AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA DISTRICT CHITRADURGA 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA SUB DIVISION CHITRADURGA 3. SRI A VENKATESHAPPA S/O ANANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS T R NAGARA, CHITRADURGA ROAD CHALLAKERE CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 4. SRI GOUTHAM S/O SRI A VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS T R NAGARA, CHITRADURGA ROAD CHALLAKERE CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 5. SMT. PALLAVI D/O SRI A VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS T R NAGARA, CHITRADURGA ROAD CHALLAKERE CHITRADURGA DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATTE FOR C/RESPONDNETS 3 TO 5) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46086-DB WA No. 1852 of 2024 ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 29.11.2024 IN WRIT PETITION 10303/2022 (SC-ST) AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. Despite several opportunities, the office objections have not been complied with. The Deficit Court Fee has also not been paid. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants fairly states that enough opportunities have been granted and the appellants are unresponsive. 3. In view of the failure on the part of the appellants to cure the office objections, the present appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE YKL/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23