1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A PATIL & SRI. M.N. UMASHANKAR, MEMBER WP.No. 20209/2023(L-KSRTC) (Lok Adalat No. 379 /2024) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER K.S.R.T.C. RAMANAGARA DIVISION, RAMANAGARA, HEREIN REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER K.S.R.T.C., CENTRAL OFFICES, K H ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANJEEV B L, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI GOVINDAPPA S/O PUTTAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, C/O VICE PRESIDENT KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT MAZDUR UNION, NO.458, 2 OTC ROAD, COTTONPET BENGALURU - 560 053 …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE AWARD DATED 17/12/2022 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA IN ID NO.45/2016, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the Award dated 17.12.2022 passed by the Principal District and Sessions, Ramanagara in I.D. No45/2016 vide Annexure ‘D’. 2. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows : "The WP filed against the award in ID.No.45/2016 dated 17.12.2022 on the file of the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Ramanagara has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under: 1. The petitioner - Corporation to reinstate the Respondent workman into service with continuity of service and consequential benefits, but without backwages from the date of dismissal till the date of actual reinstatement. 3 2. The Respondent workman is not entitled for any difference of wages from the date of award till the date of settlement. 3. The absent period is treated as not on duty not a continuous service under section 2A of the gratuity Act and pending default cases at the time of dismissal, which are filed will be reopened. 4. The parties to the proceedings have agreed for the above terms. The parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 12.07.2025 at Bengaluru Bench." 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo modifying the Award dated 17.12.2022 passed by the Principal District and Sessions, Ramanagara in I.D. No45/2016 vide Annexure ‘D’. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Srk 4 FILED BEFORE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT WP.No. 20209/2023 (LOK ADALATH NO.379/2024) BETWEEN: The Divisional Controller, KSRTC ... Petitioner AND: Sri Govindappa ... Respondent JOINT MEMO The WP filed against the award in Id No.45/2016 dated 17.12.2022 on the file of the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Ramanagara has been settled between the parties on the parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under. 1. The petitioner – Corporation to reinstate the Respondent – workman into service with continuity of service and consequential benefits, but without backwages from the date of dismissal till the date of actual reinstatement. 2. The Respondent – workman is not entitled for any difference of wages from the date of award till the date of settlement. 3. The absent period is treated as not on duty not a continuous service under section 2A of the gratuity Act and pending default cases at the time of dismissal, which are filed will be reopened. 4. The parties to the proceedings have agreed for the above terms. The parties this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 12.07.2025 at Bengaluru Bench. Sd/- Sd/- SIGNATURE OF APPELLANT SIGNATURE OF RESPONDENT/S Sd/- ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT/S Sy