COCP-3418-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 COCP-3418-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.09.2025 Kulwinder Singh ......Petitioner Vs. Anindita Mitra, IAS and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Ms. Jaskirat Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Sunny Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 16.12.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-33918-2024. 2. The relevant portion of order dated 16.12.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-33918-2024, is reproduced as under:- “4. Mr. Arun Gupta, DAG, Punjab who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that in case, the representation 08.12.2021 (Annexure P-14), has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of 08 weeks from the date of the receipt of certified SAHIL 2025.09.04 21:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3418-2025 (O&M) -2- copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioner in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be conveyed to the petitioner for his information and necessary action.” 3. Learned State counsel submits that in compliance of order dated 16.12.2024, a speaking order dated 21.08.2025 has been passed. Copy of the same has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner and also placed on record. 4. A perusal of speaking order dated 21.08.2025, shows that order dated 16.12.2024, passed by this Court in CWP-33918-2024, has been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same. 5. In view of the above, the contempt is purged and rule is discharged. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE September 01st, 2025 Sahil Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAHIL 2025.09.04 21:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.