Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78023 (KAR)

MR.ABU UMAR v. THAJAMUL HUSSAINS

RPFC/6/2021 · 2025-07-21

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI RPFC NO. 6 OF 2021 BETWEEN SRI ABU UMAR, S/O AHMEDULLA QURESHI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT #416/2, 14TH CROSS, FATHIMA LAYOUT, NEAR SHOE FACTORY, BENGALURU – 560 005. ...PETITIONER/S By SRI/SMT.: NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . THAJAMUL HUSSAINS, S/O ABU UMAR, AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER, 2 . SMT. SUMAYA KHANAM, W/O ABU UMAR, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, …2 RPFC NO. 6 of 2021 2 RESPONDENT NOS. 1 AND 2 ARE R/AT: #437, SHANTHINAGAR, MYSURU – 570 019. ...RESPONDENT/S RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.08.2018 PASSED IN Crl. Misc. 105/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT MYSURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr. P. C. FOR MAINTENANCE. This RPFC coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order. ORAL ORDER A week’s time is granted to do the needful. By that time, if the needful is not done, the petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. Delete from the caption for ‘dismissal’. Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI …3 RPFC NO. 6 of 2021 3 NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 21.07.2025, office objections are not complied with. Hence, the petition is hereby dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS Ty.Dt. : 31.01.2026 C.Dt : 11.02.2026