ABDUL AZIZ BHAT AND ORS. v. REVENUE(State Government)
OWP/698/2018 · 2025-07-29
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7802 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7802 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 04 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR OWP 698/2018 IA(1/2018) Abdul Aziz Bhat And Ors. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. State of J&K and Others.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway, GA.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 29.07.2025
01. The record reveals that none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners on 31st December, 2024 and also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 28th May,
2025.
02. Today, when the instant matter was taken up for
consideration, there was once again no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are no longer interested in prosecuting the present writ petition. May be the cause of action for which the instant writ petition was filed, no longer survives or may have been redressed by this point of time, which could be the reason that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge SRINAGAR: 29.07.2025
“HAMID”