Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7802 (ALL)

PRAVEENA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A483/74/2025 · 2025-05-05

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72280 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 74 of 2025 Applicant :- Praveena Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ghana Ram Niranjan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the trial of Complaint Case No. 1148 of 2021, under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, P.S.- George Town, District- Prayagraj pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 7, Allahabad expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before this Court is the complainant in the said case, which is pending since 2021. It is further submitted that summoning order in the matter was passed on 22.11.2021 and the opposite party no.2 was summoned to face trial under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. It is further submitted that in the instant case the evidence has been completed by both the sides but the accused has a tendency to abscond and that is why no effective proceedings are taking place in this matter. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest to decide the said case. Applicant in this case has suffered monetary loss. The accused is not cooperating with the case. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the case preferably within six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad