Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 78005 (PNJ)

GURLAL SINGH v. PUNJABI UNIVERSITY PATIALA AND OTHERS

CWP/19566/2025 · 2025-08-20

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 120 Gurlal Singh Punjabi University Patiala And Others CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. benefits, the petitioner is entitled to the interest with regard to which legal notice dated 03.06.2025, Annexure P respondents, prays may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2. submits that accordance with law amount would be 3. 4. 20.08.2025 parveen kumar Whether Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurlal Singh Versus Punjabi University Patiala And Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Bhumika Khatri, Advocate for Mr. Hardeep Singh Saini, Advocate, Mr. H.S.Batth, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that for the delayed release of retrial benefits, the petitioner is entitled to the interest with regard to which legal notice dated 03.06.2025, Annexure P respondents, but the same has yet not evoked a prays may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 submits that the same shall be decided within a period of accordance with law and in case, the petitioner is found entitled, the would be accordingly released. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. Disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19566-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 20.08.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Bhumika Khatri, Advocate for Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. H.S.Batth, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Learned counsel submits that for the delayed release of retrial benefits, the petitioner is entitled to the interest with regard to which a legal notice dated 03.06.2025, Annexure P-3, has been served upon the yet not evoked any response, which she prays may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, on instructions, shall be decided within a period of 4 months, in petitioner is found entitled, the The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.21 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.