IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4777 of 2012 Date of Decision: 28.02.2025 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Kitabwati Kothari …….Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal and Mr. Raj Pal Thakur, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer and Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that on account of subsequent development, whereby petitioner has been granted benefits, as prayed in the instant petition, he has instructions to withdraw the present petition. 2. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge February 28,2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?