IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73803 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2021 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Bhim Sahani Son of Jaga Sahani Resident of village - Semuapur, P.S.- Dumariya Ghat, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar Mr. Hemant Ray For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 18-01-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 18.07.2024, he is a person with clean antecedent and is alleged to have assaulted Nisha Kumari by farsa causing injury on head and thereafter, it is alleged that other accused persons started committing dacoity in the house of the informant as detailed in the FIR. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that allegation is of assaulting Nisha by farsa causing injury on head. It is also submitted that injury is recorded in the order impugned. It is next submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73803 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 that the injury was a sharp cutting wound of size 3½ x ¼ x scalp deep with heavy bleeding and complain of body ache. It is next submitted that nature of injury has not been recorded which amply demonstrates that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application and submits that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted a woman on head by farsa causing injury. It is also submitted that if petitioner is granted the privilege of bail, the petitioner may abscond. 5. On query of the Court as to whether charges against the petitioner has been framed or not, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly submits that charges till date has not been framed. 6. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application with liberty to renew his prayer after framing of charge. 7. Permission is accorded. 8. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T