258 TARA CHAND STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. the petitioner had filed an appeal 08.03.2013, deciding the appeal dated 18.01.2024 2. already been decided and the same has been rejected. 3. said fact, the present petition may kindly be disposed of a pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition by challenging the order passed in the appeal. 4. 5. 06-05-2025 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23333 Date of Decision : 06 TARA CHAND VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Daljeet Singh Randhawa, Advocate for Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, for the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Raj, Addl. A.G., Punjab. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behal the petitioner had filed an appeal against the order of punishment dated 08.03.2013, which has not been decided hence, the prayer of the petitioner for ing the appeal dated 18.01.2024 (Annexure P Learned counsel for the respondent already been decided and the same has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the said fact, the present petition may kindly be disposed of a pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition by challenging the order passed in the appeal. Ordered accordingly. Pending application, if any, also stand 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 23333-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision : 06-05-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS ........Respondent(s) HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Daljeet Singh Randhawa, Advocate for aise, Advocate Himanshu Raj, Addl. A.G., Punjab. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that against the order of punishment dated which has not been decided hence, the prayer of the petitioner for (Annexure P-2) expeditiously. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the appeal has already been decided and the same has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the said fact, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition by , if any, also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE : YES NO HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI f of the petitioner submits that against the order of punishment dated which has not been decided hence, the prayer of the petitioner for State submits that the appeal has Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the s having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition by (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.08 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document