Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77967 (BOM)

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NANDUR MADHYAMESHWAR PROJECT, DIVISION NASHIK. v. MANJULABAI VITHOBA GUND (PATIL) AND ORS.

IA/18707/2022 · 2025-11-19

Shri Rajesh S Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20. IA 18707-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 18707 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 8751 OF 2021 The Executive Engineer, Nandur Madhyameshwar ..Applicant Project, Nashik IN THE MATTER BETWEEN The Executive Engineer, Nandur Madhyameshwar ..Appellant Project, Nashik Versus Manjulabai Vithoba Gund (Patil) & ors. ..Respondents Mr. Mahesh Pawar i/b. Ms. Chaitrali Deshmukh, Advocates, for the Applicant Mr. Aman Kazi i/b. Mr. Sachin Gite, Advocates, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 Mr. A. R. Patil, Addl. GP, for Respondent No. 6 - State CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 19.11.2025 P. C. 1. This is an Application filed for restoration of the First Appeal as the same was dismissed pursuant to an Order dated 11.07.2022 passed by the Registrar (Judicial-II), granting time to the Appellant to remove office objections. Since the Appellant failed to remove office objections within time, the First Appeal stood dismissed. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. Anand 1 of 2 ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Digitally signed by ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Date: 2025.11.20 16:59:25 +0530 20. IA 18707-2022.doc 3. I have gone through the contents of the Interim Application and I am convinced that the Interim Application requires to be allowed. 4. The Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) & (d) and disposed of. 5. Office objections to be removed within a period of three weeks from today. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Anand 2 of 2