Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77964 (BOM)

VINAY REVAN BABAR PATIL v. SPL. RECOVERY SEIZURE AND SALES OFFICER NAVI MUMBAI AND ORS

WP/5543/2024 · 2025-11-13

Shri Amit Borkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30-wp5543-2024.doc AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5543 OF 2024 Vinay Revan Babar Patil … Petitioner V/s. Special Recovery, Seizure and Sales Officer, Navi Mumbai & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Suraj Gothwal with Mr. Shubham Ghorpade for the petitioner. Mr. Mahendra Shingade for respondent No.2. Mr. Rohit Sachadeo for respondent No.3-CIDCO. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 13, 2025 P.C.: 1. The petitioner is seeking relief against Special Recovery Officer and a society not to recover maintenance in furtherance of certificate issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. 2. This is a novel attempt to get over certificates issued by the Registrar. If the petitioner is aggrieved by issuance of certificate or any precipitative action initiated by the Special Recovery Officer under Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961, proper remedy for the petitioner is as provided under the Act, and Rules. It is open for the petitioner to adopt appropriate proceedings as are permissible in law. However, the writ petition seeking such relief cannot be entertained. 1 ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Digitally signed by ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2025.11.13 18:10:28 +0530 30-wp5543-2024.doc 3. Hence, keeping all questions raised in this writ petition open to be agitated in an appropriate proceedings, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2