Neeta Sawant STM-WP-13954-2016.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13954 OF 2016 Gufic Private Limited …..Petitioner : Versus : M/s. The Himalaya Drug Company & Anr. ….Respondents Ms. Jaanvi Chopra i/b. Khaitan & Co., for the Petitioner. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 10 NOVEMBER 2025. P.C : 1) Motion is made for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 4 November 2025. 2) In para-1 fourth line, the date ‘22 April 2025’ be corrected as ‘22 April 2015’. The order be corrected and be read accordingly. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO. 1 of 3 MONDAY, 10 NOVEMBER 2025 Neeta Sawant STM-WP-13954-2016.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13954 OF 2016 Gufic Private Limited …..Petitioner : Versus : M/s. The Himalaya Drug Company and anr. ….Respondents Mr. Rashmin Khandekar a/w. Mr. Nishad Nadkarni, Mr. Aasif Navodia, Ms. Khushboo Jhunjhunwala, Ms. Jaanvi Chopra and Ms. Rakshita Singh i/b. Khaitan & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr. Raghav Gupta, a/w. Ms. Treesa Benny, Ms. Rashi Savla i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co., for Respondent No.1. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 4 NOVEMBER 2025. P.C : 1) Mr. Khandekar, the learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff/Petitioner places on record copy of order dated 15 October 2025 which creates an impression that the stay on the Suit granted vide order dated 22 April 2015 has been vacated and the Suit is kept for hearing on 11 November 2025. Since the order granting stay to the Suit now appears to be vacated, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the petition. 2) Mr. Gupta, the learned counsel appearing for the Defendant/Respondent No.1 would submit that liberty be granted to Respondent No.1 to exercise appropriate remedies in respect of the order _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO. 2 of 3 MONDAY, 10 NOVEMBER 2025 Neeta Sawant STM-WP-13954-2016.docx passed by the Trial Court vacating the stay on the Suit. It is for the Defendant/Respondent No.1 to exercise the remedies in respect of order vacating the stay. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Note : Correction is carried out in para-1 of the order only pursuant to speaking to minutes order dated 10 November 2025. The rest of the order remains undisturbed. _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO. 3 of 3 MONDAY, 10 NOVEMBER 2025 NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2025.11.10 15:01:36 +0530