Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77942 (KAR)

SRI L KUMARAGURU v. SRI SATHYANARAYANA

RFA/1066/2010 · 2025-10-16

R Nataraj

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41439 RFA No. 1066 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1066 OF 2010 (DEC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. L. KUMARAGURU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2. SRI. L. SHARAVANAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS BOTH ARE SONS OF SRI. LOGANATHAN R/O 125, 11TH MAIN, VASANTH NAGAR BANGALORE-560052 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VINOD GOWDA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. SATHYANARAYANA S/O SRI. K. MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/O NO.2, MUDDAPPA ROAD, MARUTHISEVANAGAR BANGALORE-560052 2. THE SUB-REGISTRAR SHIVAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BANGALORE, NARASIMHARAJA SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 001. 4. THE SECRETARY H.U.D., Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41439 RFA No. 1066 of 2010 MULTISTORIED BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001. 5. SRI. D. LOGANATHAN S/O SRI DORAIRAJ AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS NO.50, R.P. ROAD, BANGALORE-560052. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.L. DAYANANDA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. N.R.JAGADEESWARA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3; SRI. B. BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 4; SRI. MEHTER M. AZZAM, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.5) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.03.2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.8192/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal was listed on 14.10.2025. The learned counsel for the appellants was absent. In order to accommodate him, this appeal was listed on 15.10.2025. On 15.10.2025 also, there was no representation for the appellants - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41439 RFA No. 1066 of 2010 and therefore, the case was listed today. Even today, there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3