X '~s APHC010080612018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3549 OF 2018 Between: S.Nageswara Reddy, S/o. Sri S.Venkata Reddy Hindu, aged 67 years Occ. Cultivation, R/o.Juttiga (V) Penumantra Mandal, W.G.District Andhra Pradesh Smt.S.Bharathi Saroja, W/o.Sri S.Nageswara Reddy Hindu, aged 62 years, Occ.Housewife R/o.Juttiga (V) Penumantra Mandal, W.G.District Andhra Pradesh K.Srinivasa Reddy, S/o.Panthulu Reddy Hindu, aged 48 years R/o.Mallipudi Village, Penumantra Mandal, W.G.District Andhra Pradesh Smt.S.Sriveni, W/o.Sri S.Singu Reddy Hindu, aged 40 years R/o.Mallipudi Village Penumantra Mandal, W.G.District Andhra Pradesh Smt.S.Vijaya Kumari, W/o.Sri S.Srinivasa Reddy Hindu, aged 38 years, Occ.Housewife R/o.Juttiga Village, Penumantra Mandal West Godavari District, AP 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ...Petitioners AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. The Station House Officer, Ravulapalem Police Station Ravulapalem, East Godavari District Andhra Pradesh 1. 2. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2 nd respondent in interfering with petitioners life and liberty by summoning and detaining them in the police station and insisting for the presence of 1st Petitioners son as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.2 not to interfere with our life and liberty pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners; SR! TURAGA SA! SURYA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010080612018 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3549/2018 Between; 1.S.NAGESWARA REDDY, S/0.SRI S.VENKATA REDDY HINDU AGED 67 YEARS PENUMANTRA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH OCC.CULTIVATION, R/O.JUTTIGA (V) 2.SMT.S.BHARATHI SAROJA W/O.SRI S.NAGESWARA REDDY HINDU, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC.HOUSEWIFE R/O.JUTTIGA (V) PENUMANTRA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 3.K.SRINIVASA REDDY,, S/O.PANTHULU REDDY HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS R/O.MALLIPUDI VILLAGE, PENUMANTRA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 4.SMT.S.SRIVENI,, W/O.SRI S.SINGU REDDY HINDU, AGED 40 YEARS R/O.MALLIPUDI VILLAGE PENUMANTRA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 5.SMT.S.VIJAYA KUMARI, W/O.SRI S.SRINIVASA REDDY HINDU, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC.HOUSEWIFE R/O.JUTTIGA VILLAGE, PENUMANTRA MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AP ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, PRADESH. AP SECRETARIAT, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA 2.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICFR ra\/i n adai r-» w.p.no.3549of2018 «.VUUPALE„, PAST 000^,^^“S " ...RESPONDENT(S): Circumstances ^ of a writ of Mandarnus TecLra interfering With petitioners life and (ihprt respondent in jA NO: 1 OF 2Q1R Petition under Section 1^1 ppp r.i—. ■ al. disposal of the above writ petition and Counsel for the Petifioner(S): 1.TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: son as highly ' of India and may be pleased our life and liberty pending pass 14'-' 3 HN,J W.P.IMO.3549OF2018 the honourable SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. WRIT PETITION NO: N ORDER:- Despite the matter being listed under none represented for the petitioners, representation for the petitioners. 2. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for shad be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions the caption for dismissal, today On earlier occasion also there is no non-prosecution. There pending, if any, shall stand closed. officer //TRUE COPY// SECTI To, 1. OneCCto Sri. Turaga Sai Surya Advocate 2. TwoCCsto GP for Home, 3. Three CD Copies GSC [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] *3 HIGH COURT DATED:26/06/2025 ORDER WP NO. 3549 OF 2018 DISMISSING THE WP AS NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS