INDUSVIVA HEALTHSCIENCES PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/18604/2023 · 2025-05-03
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77928 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77928 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-18604 CWP-18734 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
1. CWP-18604 Indusviva Health Sciences Pvt. Ltd. State of Punjab and others
2. CWP-18734 Indusviva Health Sciences Pvt. Ltd. State of Haryana and others
CORAM:
Present:
KULDEEP TIWARI, J.
1.
the common relief has been sought are taken up together for adjudication.
2.
Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a directions, upon the
18604-2023 and 18734-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
18604-2023 Indusviva Health Sciences Pvt. Ltd.
Versus State of Punjab and others
18734-2023 Indusviva Health Sciences Pvt. Ltd.
Versus State of Haryana and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP Ms. Sonia G. Singh Samber, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in both the cases.
Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab for respondents No.1, 3 and 4 in CWP
Mr. Rajesh Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana for respondents No.1, 3 and 4 in
Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondent No.2-Union of India **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Both the instant petitions are amenable to be decided together, as the common relief has been sought therein, t are taken up together for adjudication. Through the instant petitions, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a directions, upon the
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision : 03.05.2025
…Petitioner Versus
...Respondents
…Petitioner Versus
...Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Sonia G. Singh Samber, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in both the cases. Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab 3 and 4 in CWP-18604-2023. Mr. Rajesh Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana for respondents No.1, 3 and 4 in CWP-18734-2023. Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Sr. Panel Counsel Union of India, in both the cases. Both the instant petitions are amenable to be decided together, as , therefore, both the instant petitions Through the instant petitions, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a directions, upon the
Both the instant petitions are amenable to be decided together, as herefore, both the instant petitions Through the instant petitions, cast under Articles 226/227 of the MANPREET SINGH Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a directions, upon the 2025.05.06 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-18604 CWP-18734 respondents, to implement Rule 11 of the Consumer Protection (Direct Selling) Rules, 2021, and to set up a mechanism in the State of Punjab and Haryana, to monitor, supervise and regulate the business and the activities of direct seller and direct selling
3.
Haryana, that during the pendency of the instant petitions, Haryana, as already framed the apposite rules and regulations, whereas,
learned counsel for the State o Dr. Anjuman Bhaskar, Additional Director, Food Court, that they are in the process of framing the rules and regulations, and the said exercise will be completed within the next th
4.
States of Punjab and Haryana, no further direction is required to be passed in the instant writ petitions, and the same are hereby
5.
submission made before this Court, shall ensure the framing of rules and regulations, within the next three months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
6.
7.
numbered above.
May 03, 2025 Manpreet
18604-2023 and 18734-2023 respondents, to implement Rule 11 of the Consumer Protection (Direct Selling) Rules, 2021, and to set up a mechanism in the State of Punjab and Haryana, to monitor, supervise and regulate the business and the activities of direct seller and direct selling entity. It is informed to this Court, by learned counsel for the State of Haryana, that during the pendency of the instant petitions, Haryana, as already framed the apposite rules and regulations, whereas,
learned counsel for the State of Punjab, on instructions imparted to him by Dr. Anjuman Bhaskar, Additional Director, Food Court, that they are in the process of framing the rules and regulations, and the said exercise will be completed within the next th In view of the specific stand taken by the learned counsel for the States of Punjab and Haryana, no further direction is required to be passed in the instant writ petitions, and the same are hereby However, learned counsel for the State of Punjab, in view of the submission made before this Court, shall ensure the framing of rules and regulations, within the next three months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Consequently, both the instant petitio Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case numbered above. May 03, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether reportable
2 respondents, to implement Rule 11 of the Consumer Protection (Direct Selling) Rules, 2021, and to set up a mechanism in the State of Punjab and Haryana, to monitor, supervise and regulate the business and the activities of It is informed to this Court, by learned counsel for the State of Haryana, that during the pendency of the instant petitions, the State of Haryana, as already framed the apposite rules and regulations, whereas, on instructions imparted to him by Dr. Anjuman Bhaskar, Additional Director, Food Civil Supplies, informs this Court, that they are in the process of framing the rules and regulations, and the said exercise will be completed within the next three months. taken by the learned counsel for the States of Punjab and Haryana, no further direction is required to be passed in the instant writ petitions, and the same are hereby closed. r the State of Punjab, in view of the submission made before this Court, shall ensure the framing of rules and regulations, within the next three months, from the date of receipt of certified Consequently, both the instant petitions, are disposed of.
Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file, as
(KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
: Yes/No
respondents, to implement Rule 11 of the Consumer Protection (Direct Selling) Rules, 2021, and to set up a mechanism in the State of Punjab and Haryana, to monitor, supervise and regulate the business and the activities of It is informed to this Court, by learned counsel for the State of the State of Haryana, as already framed the apposite rules and regulations, whereas, on instructions imparted to him by informs this Court, that they are in the process of framing the rules and regulations, and the taken by the learned counsel for the States of Punjab and Haryana, no further direction is required to be passed in r the State of Punjab, in view of the submission made before this Court, shall ensure the framing of rules and regulations, within the next three months, from the date of receipt of certified file, as
MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.06 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment