Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77920 (PNJ)

RAMJOT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRR/2228/2019 · 2025-05-13

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-2228-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:13.05.2025 Ramjot Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bedi, Advocate General, Punjab, assisted with Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab. Mr. P.S. Punia, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI J.(Oral) 1. None has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The same was the position on the last date of hearing as well. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 submitted that the present petition has been filed seeking directions for setting aside the impugned order dated 30.08.2019 whereby the application filed under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. for summoning of respondent No.2 as an additional accused was dismissed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, but during the pendency of the present petition, the main accused has already been acquitted. He submitted that the allegations in the present case were pertaining to having illicit relationship but since the main accused SHWETA 2025.05.15 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRR-2228-2019 (O&M) -2- has been acquitted nothing would survive for adjudication in the present petition. 4. Since learned counsel for the petitioner has not appeared today, as well as on the last date of hearing, it appears that he is no longer interested in pursuing the present petition. 5. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE 13.05.2025 shweta Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SHWETA 2025.05.15 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document