- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52242 WP No. 2927 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 2927 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. RADEL ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 74/D KEONICS ELECTORNIC CITY POICE STATION HOSUR ROAD BANGALORE KARNATAKA - 560 100. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR. G. RAJ NARAYAN …PETITIONER (BY SMT. APARNA MAHESH HIREMATH FOR SRI. SURESH T S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HOME 2ND FLOOR VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. INSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL METROLOGY NO 1, ALI ASKER ROAD NEAR RAJ BHAVAN BENGALURU Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52242 WP No. 2927 of 2022 KARNATAKA - 560 051. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 10.03.2021 AT ANNEXURE-A ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard Smt. Aparna Mahesh Hiremath, learned counsel appearing for Sri. Suresh T.S., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Mahantesh Shettar, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. In this writ petition the petitioner is assailing the notice dated 10.03.2021 (Annexure-A) issued by the respondent-authorities against the petitioners. 3. On perusal of the writ petition, it would indicate that the cognizance has been taken by the respondent- authorities and the same is pending for consideration before the competent Court in C.C.No.16799/2021 (Annexure-B). - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52242 WP No. 2927 of 2022 4. In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that, no further orders are required to be made with regard to issuance of the notice at Annexure-A. Since, the cognizance has been taken in C.C.No.16799/2021 which is already registered before the competent Court. 5. Hence, reserving liberty to challenge the proceedings as shown at Annexure-B to the writ petition, no further orders have to be made in this petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33