290 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-51707-2022 Date of Decision:- 01.04.2025 Nikhil Popli and Ors. ....Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Advocate for petitioners. Ms. Nidhi Garg, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Abhinav Rawal, Advocate for Mr. Bharat Bhusan, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. ***** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. 1. Learned counsel representing State has filed status report, which is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner states that despite compromise and settlement of terms and conditions, now respondents No.2 & 3 are not coming forward for recording of their statements to quash FIR No.324 dated 10.08.2022 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 323, 377, 498-A, 406 of IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 14, Panchkula on the basis of compromise dated 14.09.2022 (Annexure P-4). In the light of this, he has instructions to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh petition for quashing of FIR on merits. 3. In view of the statement, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 01.04.2025 sunil devi Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sunil Devi 2025.04.02 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document