Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77902 (PNJ)

JAGROOP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/36590/2025 · 2025-07-15

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2025.07.15 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM-M-36590-2025 -2- 4. On the asking of Court, Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State, while Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 and submitted that he has no objection if the present petition is accepted. 5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. 6. Since the only allegation against the petitioner is that he had introduced the complainant with Gurjinder Singh, who was working as a travel agent as also the fact that the parties have entered into a compromise (Annexure P-3) and a quashing petition has been preferred before this Court on the basis of a compromise, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted concession of anticipatory bail, subject to the conditions as provided 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. It will be open for the investigating officer to call the petitioner to join the investigation, if so required, by issuing a written notice in this regard and he shall abide by the conditions mentioned in Section 482(2) of BNSS. (N.S. SHEKHAWAT) 15.07.2025 JUDGE mks Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES / NO Whether Reportable: YES / NO MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2025.07.15 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh