130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Santosh Union Territory of Chandigarh and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. The husband of the petitioner was a street vendor in Sector Chandigarh. 2. After the death of her husband, the petitioner moved an application seeking transfer of vending license in her favour. Since such claim has not been considered, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the administration contends that huge pending dues against the husband of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner’s prayer for shifting her vending license to a different sector is also not admissible. 4. Faced with the above objection, learned counsel for t petitioner submits that the petitioner would deposit all outstanding dues and would be satisfied if the license is restored in her name vending area which was earlier in the name of her husband. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19528 Date of Decision: Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate for the Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. *** KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) The husband of the petitioner was a street vendor in Sector After the death of her husband, the petitioner moved an application seeking transfer of vending license in her favour. Since such claim has not been considered, the petitioner is before this Court. Learned counsel for the administration contends that huge pending dues against the husband of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner’s prayer for shifting her vending license to a different sector is also not admissible. Faced with the above objection, learned counsel for t petitioner submits that the petitioner would deposit all outstanding dues and would be satisfied if the license is restored in her name which was earlier in the name of her husband. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 19528-2025 (O&M) ate of Decision: 06.08.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ROHIT KAPOOR , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. The husband of the petitioner was a street vendor in Sector-15, After the death of her husband, the petitioner moved an application seeking transfer of vending license in her favour. Since such claim has not been considered, the petitioner is before this Court. Learned counsel for the administration contends that there are huge pending dues against the husband of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner’s prayer for shifting her vending license to a different Faced with the above objection, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would deposit all outstanding dues and would be satisfied if the license is restored in her name over the same which was earlier in the name of her husband. 15, After the death of her husband, the petitioner moved an application seeking transfer of vending license in her favour. Since such there are huge pending dues against the husband of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner’s prayer for shifting her vending license to a different he petitioner submits that the petitioner would deposit all outstanding dues and the same RAJESH KUMAR 2025.08.12 13:05 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-19528-2025 (O&M) [2] 5. In that view of the matter, we permit the petitioner to approach 3rd respondent along with an undertaking to deposit the amount in terms of the directions of the committee. If such a claim is raised before 3rd respondent, the same shall be accorded consideration in accordance with law, in the next meeting which is to be held for the purpose or immediately thereafter. 6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 7. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE 06.08.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2025.08.12 13:05 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.