M/S ROLEX HOSIERY (P) LIMITED v. ESI CORPORATION AND ANR
FAO/8140/2014 · 2025-04-03
Pankaj Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77883 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77883 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[232]
M/s Rolex Hosiery (P) Limited
ESI Corporation and another
Coram :
Present:
PANKAJ JAIN
[1]
speaking Rs.3,62,346/ counsel representing ESI. Copy thereof is taken on record. [2]
[3]
disposed off
03.04.2025 ‘R. Sharma'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-8140 Date of Decision :
M/s Rolex Hosiery (P) Limited
versus ESI Corporation and another
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, Advocate
for the appellant.
Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for respondent No.1.
*** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the appellant submits that the ESI has passed the speaking order, in compliance of which, demand draft amounting to Rs.3,62,346/- has been brought and the same has been handed to the counsel representing ESI. Copy thereof is taken on record.
Appeal stands disposed off.
All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands
disposed off.
03.04.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 8140-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision : 03.04.2025
…Appellant
….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate Advocate Counsel for the appellant submits that the ESI has passed the in compliance of which, demand draft amounting to has been brought and the same has been handed to the counsel representing ESI. Copy thereof is taken on record.
All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands
(PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE
: Yes/No : Yes/No
Counsel for the appellant submits that the ESI has passed the in compliance of which, demand draft amounting to has been brought and the same has been handed to the All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.04.04 13:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document