SUDAMA YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/6576/2025 · 2025-09-08
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77860 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77860 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 6576 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A for the State,
learned counsel for the respondent no.2 as also perused the record.
2. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been preferred to set aside the impugned summoning order dated 13.06.2025 passed by Special Judge SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Ghazipur in Complaint Case No.58 of 2023, under Sections 323, 379, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2) (va) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Mardah, District Ghazipur.
3. Submission of learned counsel for the appellants is that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case just to pressurize and harass the appellants, in fact, no such incident has taken place. The appellants have never committed any offence as alleged against them. Further submission is that no offence against the appellants is disclosed and the court below has utterly failed to consider as no prima facie case is made out against the appellants. He also pointed out certain documents in support of his contention.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer to set aside the impugned cognizance order as mentioned above is hereby refused.
5. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellants submitted that directions may be given to the court below to consider the bail application of the appellants in accordance with law.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the present appeal is Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Girish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Lakshmi Kant Pandey, Sandeep Kumar Pandey Sudama Yadav And 2 Others .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s)
disposed of with the direction that in case the appellants filed bail application before the court below, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
7. With the above observations, this appeal is disposed of finally. September 9, 2025 Ajeet CRLA No. 6576 of 2025 2 (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJEET KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad