Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7786 (JK)

GHULAM RASOOL MIR(PERSONAL APPEARANCE) v. MISS MANDEEP KAUR AND ANR. (RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT)

CCP(S)/253/2022 · 2025-09-02

Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 11 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) No. 253/2022 in SWP No. 1238/2016 Ghulam Rasool Mir ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. M. A. Beigh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Irfan Rasool, Advocate V/S Miss Mandeep Kaur and Anr. ….. Respondent(s) Through: - Ms. Raheela, AC vice Mr. A. R. Malik, Sr. AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE (ORDER) 02.09.2025 01. By this petition, the petitioner has alleged non-compliance of order/Judgment dated 12.09.2017. Paragraph 5 of the said order/Judgment being relevant is taken note of:- “ 5. In this view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation espousing his claim to the respondents. Upon receipt of such representation along with a copy of this order, the respondents shall accord consideration to the claim of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks’ from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.” 02. Compliance report stands filed by the respondents, it is stated that the respondents have considered afresh the case of petitioner in light of the order/Judgment dated 12.09.2017, passed by this Court in SWP No. 1238/2016. Respondents have also placed on record the consideration order No. 497-DRDK of 2025 dated 02.07.2025, whereby the claim of the petitioner after re-examination, has been rejected, as such, the respondents have complied with the order dated 12.09.2017 in its letter Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document and spirit. Therefore, the instant contempt petition is closed. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not satisfied with the consideration order dated 02.07.2025, passed by the respondents. Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the consideration order dated 02.07.2025, if he so chooses. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 02.09.2025 “Mohammad Yasin Dar” Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document