C/M KASBELI AYURVEDIC SCHOOL v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/23786/2025 · 2025-08-11
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77855 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77855 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:136521 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23786 of 2025 Petitioner :- C/M Kasbeli Ayurvedic School Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jai Krishna Tiwari Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:-
"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.4 to forward the result / data of the students before the respondent No. 1 to 3 for consideration of scholarship. 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 1 to 3 to open the portal for submission of result and accepting the scholar ship data and further release the scholarship forthwith."
2. Sri J.K. Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4 - Registrar, Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbi Chikitsha Padhati Board, Lucknow submitted that as per instructions dated 10.07.2025, the result has already been declared. In support of his contention, he has also referred the paragraph nos.4 and 5 of the written instructions. Learned counsel for respondent no.4 has placed the instructions during the arguments, which is taken on record. 3. Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondent nos.1 to 3 submitted and undertaken that since the result has already been declared by respondent no.4, the State will take proper steps to open the portal for submission of result. 4. Heard Sri Prashant Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State- respondent nos.1 to 3, Sri Jai Krishna Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4, the contents made in the
writ petition and documents on record. 5. Taking into consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, I am of the view that no useful purpose would be served to keep the matter pending for further adjudication. 6.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 to open the portal as undertaking given by learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, within two weeks, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if no other impediment. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad