Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77850 (KAR)

SREE GANESH CONSTRUCTIONS v. THE GENERAL MANAGER

CMP/302/2023 · 2025-08-30

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33822 CMP NO.302 OF 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.302 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SREE GANESH CONSTRUCTIONS RAILWAY CONTRACTORS, D.NO.3-281, LAKSHMIPURAM, STONEHOUSEPET, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH - 524 002. REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MR. KOTAM REDDY GIRIDHAR REDDY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.R. NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCTE FOR SRI. RAJESWARA P.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, HEAD QUARTERS OFFICE, 3RD FLOOR, RAIL SOUDHA, EAST BLOCK, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, GADAG ROAD, HUBLI, KARNATAKA - 580 020. 2. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (WORKS) MYSURU DIVISION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, IRWIN ROAD, MYSURU - 570 021. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANUPARNA BORODOLOI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33822 CMP NO.302 OF 2023 THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SETION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 READ WITH PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT SCHEME, 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT AN INDEPENDENT ARBITRATOR TO DECIDE THE DISPUTE THAT HAS ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS PERTAINING TO THE CONTRACT AGREEMENT NO.1102, 1104/2019/ENGG/0207 DATED 14TH JANUARY, 2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the dispute between the parties has been resolved. 2. Accepting the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, I am of the view that, no further orders are required to be made in this petition. Accordingly, Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17