1 / 3 2025:CGHC:20178-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 484 of 2023 1 - M/s Homesh Carrier Office Address Matachoura, Old Sarkanda Bilaspur Through Partner Shri Ramchandra Sahu S/o Dulari Sahu Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Karuhnar, P. O. Salheghori Karuhnar Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sanjay Kumar Yadav @ Ramesh S/o Ganga Yadav Aged About 24 Years R/o Latagaon Satna Madhya Pradesh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Gharghoda, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Anurag Patnayak S/o Sacchidanand Patnayak Aged About 29 Years R/o Baihamuda, Police Station/ Tehsil Gharghoda, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Chetan Singh Chauhan, Advocate For State /Respondent No.1 : Mr. Hari Om Rai, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Ms. Aditi Singhvi, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Judgment on Board Per, Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 02/05/2025 ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.05.05 13:05:31 +0530 2 / 3 1. Heard Mr. Chetan Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the Petitioners. Also heard Mr. Hari Om Rai, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/ Respondent No.1 and Ms. Aditi Singhvi, learned counsel for Respondent No.2. 2. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with the following prayer:- “A) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records of the case pertaining to FIR bearing No.029/2023 lodged at Police Station – Gharghoda, District – Raigarh, CG u/s 407 & 34 of IPC for kind consideration of this Hon’ble Court, and /or; B) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate order/direction quashing the FIR bearing No.029/2023 lodged at Police Station – Gharghoda, District – Raigarh, CG u/s 407 & 34 of IPC and such incidental proceedings/investigation emanating therefrom, and/or; C) Any other relief, which the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 3. At the very outset learned State counsel would submit that the charge-sheet in this case has already been filed. 4. In view of the submission made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to challenge the charge-sheet before 3 / 3 the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the the petitioners to take recourse of law with respect to the charge-sheet. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ashu