SONU KUMAR BHARTI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/23935/2025 · 2025-07-23
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77826 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77826 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123007 Court No. - 77 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23935 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sonu Kumar Bharti And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sadhu Sharan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.225 of 2025, under Section 87 BNS, Police Station Nonhara, District Ghazipur, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Vivek Kr. Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad