Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133338 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 26928 of 2025 Applicant :- Imran Masood Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Shoeb Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. Ref:- Criminal Misc. Amendment Application No. 02 of 2025
1. Heard Sri Samsh Tabrez Alam, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohd. Shoeb Khan, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Roopak Chaubey, learned AGA for the State on the amendment application.
2. Learned counsel for applicant submits, due to mistake in the prayer clause the prayer has been made to quash the entire proceedings as well as charge-sheet filed against the applicant in place to quash the N.B.W. issued against him and therefore instant amendment application may be allowed and in the prayer clause of the instant application the prayer may be read as 'to allow the application and quash the N.B.W. issued against the applicant' in place of 'to quash the entire proceedings as well as charge-sheet filed against the applicant'.
3. Learned AGA is having no objection.
4. In view of above, the amendment application filed by the applicant stands allowed.
5. The prayer clause shall be read as 'to allow the application and quash the N.B.W. issued against the applicant'.
Order Date :- 6.8.2025 AK Pandey
Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 26928 of 2025 Applicant :- Imran Masood Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Shoeb Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
1. Sri Samsh Tabrez Alam, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohd. Shoeb Khan, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Roopak Chaubey, learned AGA for the State are present.
2. The instant application has been filed with a prayer to quash the
order dated 25.06.2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 532 of 2007, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Saharanpur.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant submits, in the instant application N.B.W. issued against applicant was challenged but applicant has already surrendered and he was on interim bail, therefore, instant application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Learned AGA is having no objection.
5. In view of above, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 6.8.2025 AK Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad