$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 37/2018 UEM INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Arvind Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Nikita Choukse & Ms.Upasana Chandrashekaran, Advs. versus PALL INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jayant Mehta with Mr.Joseph Pookkatt, Mr.Navudaya Singh Rajpurohit & Mr.Dhawesh Pahuja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI O R D E R % 29.01.2020 IA No.11222/2019 (for modification of order dt. 01.08.2019) 1. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is ripe for hearing, he has instructions not to press the present application. 2. The application is dismissed as not pressed. IA No.11751/2019 (for deferment of directions) 3. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press the present application. 4. The application is dismissed as not pressed. IA No.539/2020 (for delay of 47 days in filing reply to the written submissions of the petitioner) 5. This is an application filed by the respondent seeking condonation of 47 days’ delay in filing the reply to the written submissions of the petitioner. 6. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts notice and does not oppose the application. 7. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay in filing reply to the written submissions of the petitioner is condoned. 8. The application is disposed of. 9. The reply filed by the respondent to the written submissions of the petitioner is taken on record. O.M.P. (COMM) 37/2018 10. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be held up before some other bench in the after lunch session and he, therefore, prays for a short accommodation. The request is not opposed. 11. At request, list on 17.03.2020. REKHA PALLI, J JANUARY 29, 2020 gm