Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7780 (UTT)

BRAJENDRA KUAMR SINGHDEV v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1299/2021 · 2025-02-18

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1099 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 1327 of 2021 With WPCRL No. 1299 of 2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. 1. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Paarth Tamta, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, learned counsel for the caveator. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that writ petitions have become infructuous, inasmuch as, the Investigating Officer has filed charge- sheets and petitioners have challenged those charge-sheets in the application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petitions are dismissed, as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 18.02.2025 Aswal 2025:UHC:1099