Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77797 (MAD)

R.Saravanan v. The Tamil Nadu State rep.by,

CRL OP/20415/2025 · 2025-07-21

P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP Nos. 20415 & 20416 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN CRL OP No. 20415 of 2025 and CRL OP No. 20416 of 2025 1. R.Saravanan S/o.Ravi, D.No.1/636, RR Nagar Mukku Road, V irudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tamil Nadu State rep.by, The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.The Inspector of Police, Chennai Central Crime Branch, EDF-I Beta - 1 Police Station, Chennai. 3.Nagaraj S/o.Not known, Harshavardhan Transport, No.1/1A, New Jawaharlal Nehru 200 Feet Road, Madhavaram, Chennai-600 060. 1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP Nos. 20415 & 20416 of 2025 Respondent(s) CRL OP No. 20416 of 2025 1. G.Gurusamy @ Prabu S/o.Guruvaiah, D.No.17, 2nd Floor, Selva Vinayagar Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai-600 118. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tamil Nadu State rep.by, The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.The Inspector of Police, Chennai Central Crime Branch, EDF-I Beta - 1 Police Station, Chennai. 3.Nagaraj S/o.Not known, Harshavardhan Transport, No.1/1A, New Jawaharlal Nehru 200 Feet Road, Madhavaram, Chennai-600 060. Respondent(s) CRL OP No. 20415 of 2025 PRAYER This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP Nos. 20415 & 20416 of 2025 CRL OP No. 20416 of 2025 PRAYER This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. CRL OP Nos. 20415 & 20416 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Arulraj For For R1 and R2 For R3 Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Mr.T.Nixon COMMON ORDER The Criminal Original Petitions have been filed to direct the 2nd respondent-Police not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry. 2. Learned counsel for the de-facto complainant submitted that while the petitioners were working as employees under R3, they misappropriated the funds. Hence, he filed a complaint before the second respondent-Police. The second respondent-Police has sent summon to the petitioners herein. In order to escape from the clutches of law, the petitioners approached this Court by way of filing this petition seeking a direction not to harass them. 3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP Nos. 20415 & 20416 of 2025 3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the second respondent-Police submitted that notices were sent to the petitioners directing them to produce relevant documents. The petitioners have also appeared before the respondent-Police for enquiry, whereas they did not produce any relevant documents. Hence, the enquiry is pending. 4. It is seen from the records, based on the complaint given by the third respondent, the second respondent-Police sent summons to the petitioners. Since there is specific allegation available as against the petitioners, the second respondent Police is directed to conduct enquiry and after completion of investigation, in case, finds prima facie materials, register a case as against the petitioners. The respondent-Police cannot wait endlessly for the petitioners' reply or response. 5. Once the complaint received from the public, it is the duty of the Police to conduct enquiry, if necessary, either to conduct preliminary enquiry or has to register a case. Whereas in this case, notices have already been sent to the petitioners and though the petitioners appeared before the respondent-Police, 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP Nos. 20415 & 20416 of 2025 they did not produce sufficient documents. Hence, the investigation is pending. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the respondent-Police to complete the enquiry and proceed the case further in accordance with law. 7. With the abovesaid directions, the criminal original petitions are dismissed. 21-07-2025 mfa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP Nos. 20415 & 20416 of 2025 To 1.The Tamil Nadu State rep.by, The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.The Inspector of Police, Chennai Central Crime Branch, EDF-I Beta - 1 Police Station, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. 6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP Nos. 20415 & 20416 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN J. mfa CRL OP No. 20415 of 2025 AND CRL OP NO. 20416 OF 2025 21-07-2025 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis