Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
114
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-19382-2025
Date of Decision :11.08.2025
Poonam
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has received salary for twelve weeks of maternity leave, and the petition has accordingly been rendered infructuous.
2.
Disposed of as such.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) August 11, 2025
JUDGE ps
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No
PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.08.11 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document