Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77781 (PNJ)

MANOHRI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/19920/2025 · 2025-07-31

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-19920-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CWP-19920-2025 Date of Decision: 31.07.2025 Manhori …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the petitioner the interest on arrears of pension for the period from 01.07.2011 to 09.01.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide her pending representation, dated 05.02.2025, Annexure P-12, in a specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice and submits that the pending representation, dated 05.02.2025, will be decided by Director, Elementary Education, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months. 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. PAYAL 2025.08.02 09:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-19920-2025 -2- 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 31.07.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.08.02 09:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document