GURDEEP SINGH CHEEMA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/47/2021 · 2025-07-30
Aman Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77771 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77771 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
211 Gurdeep Singh Cheema State of Punjab
CORAM: HON
Present :
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
stated by learned State counsel that the leave encashment has since been paid though in four installments, however, no decision with regard to return of the amount accommodation done in a time bound manner.
2.
shall be done within a period of 03 months, which satisfies the learned counsel opposite.
3.
entitled, the benefit be released forthwith.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Gurdeep Singh Cheema
Versus f Punjab and Others
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Petitioner in person.
Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab Mr. Barjesh Mittal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. (through hybrid mode)
AN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The petitioner, who is appearing in person, accepts the fact as stated by learned State counsel that the leave encashment has since been paid though in four installments, however, no decision with regard to he amount charged by way of penalty for retaining govt. accommodation has been taken, which he prays, may be directed to be done in a time bound manner. Learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the needful done within a period of 03 months, which satisfies the learned counsel opposite.
Disposed of accordingly. However, if the petitioner is found entitled, the benefit be released forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders
PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-47-2021 (O & M) Date of decision: 30.07.2025
....Petitioner
...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Barjesh Mittal, Advocate,
(through hybrid mode) The petitioner, who is appearing in person, accepts the fact as stated by learned State counsel that the leave encashment has since been paid though in four installments, however, no decision with regard to charged by way of penalty for retaining govt. has been taken, which he prays, may be directed to be Learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the needful done within a period of 03 months, which satisfies the learned However, if the petitioner is found Needless to say, if the orders PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.31 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.
CWP-47-2021
-2- are adverse to him, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.
30.07.2025
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.31 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.