MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT AHMEDNAGAR v. POPAT UTTAM PALVE AND ANR
CA/1845/2025 · 2025-04-15
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7777 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7777 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 178-ca-1843-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1843 OF 2025 IN FAST/3220/2025 Maharashtra State Road Transport Ahmednagar VERSUS Popat Uttam Palve And Anr ... Adv. D. S. Bagul, Advocate for Applicant ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1845 OF 2025 IN FAST/3220/2025 Maharashtra State Road Transport Ahmednagar VERSUS Popat Uttam Palve And Anr …
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : 15TH APRIL, 2025
PER COURT :- CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1843 OF 2025
1. Heard Mr. Bagul, learned Advocate appearing for the applicant.
2. Applicant seeks to condone the delay of 762 days caused in filing appeal against award passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar.
3. Perused the application and reasons stated therein. 2025:BHC-AUG:11079
2 178-ca-1843-2025 Apparently, delay is caused due to administrative exigencies. Applicant has not derived any advantage by making delay. The contents of application are not controverted by the respondents. Hence, case is made out to condone the delay, in result, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and disposed of.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1845 OF 2025
1. None appears for respondent, in spite of service of notice.
2. Mr. Bagul submits that entire amount as per award passed by the Tribunal has been deposited with Tribunal. His statement is not controverted by the respondent. Hence, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘C’ and
disposed of.
( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) Rushikesh/2025