Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77759 (KAR)

CHIKKABASAVAIAH v. GOWRAMMA

RSA/427/2013 · 2025-08-28

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33743 RSA No. 427 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 427 OF 2013 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. 1(A) 1(B) 1(C) 1(D) 1(E) CHIKKABASAVAIAH S/O CHANNABASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/O NITTUR VILLAGE GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT (SINCE DEAD BY LRS) SHIVARUDRAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKABASAVAIAH AGED 65 YEARS BASAVARAJU.N.C. S/O LATE CHIKKABASAVAIAH AGED 53 YEARS SHASHIDARA.N.C. S/O LATE CHIKKABASAVAIAH AGED 48 YEARS SHIVAKUMARASWAMY.N.C. S/O LATE CHIKKAVASAVAIAH AGED 44 YEARS DEVARAJU.N.C. S/O LATE CHIKKAVASAVAIAH AGED 41 YEARS ALL ARE R/O NITTUR VILLAGE GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DIST. …APPELLANTS (APPELLANTS-ABSENT) Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33743 RSA No. 427 of 2013 AND: 1. GOWRAMMA W/O SIDDARAMAIAH AGED 62 YEARS 2. SHIVARAMAIAH S/O SIDDARAMAIAH 40 YEARS 3. SATHISHA S/O SIDDARAMAIAH 38 YEARS 4. SIDDESHA S/O SIDDARAMAIAH 56 YEARS 5. BASAVARAJU S/O MARIYAPPA 57 YEARS ALL ARE R/O NITTUR VILLAGE GUBBI TALUK …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.B.CHANDRACHOODA., ADVOCATE FOR R3; R1-APPEAL ABATED V.C.O. DT. 25.4.2025; R2, R4 AND R5-SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 22.9.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.219/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUBBI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 1.1.2003 PASSED IN OS.NO.194/1990 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC., GUBBI. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33743 RSA No. 427 of 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants was permitted to retire from the case vide order dated 13.08.2025. 2. The appeal is of the year 2013, the names of appellants are shown in the cause list. There is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19