Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77751 (KAR)

MR RAJA v. M/S BOLA RAGAVENDRA KAMATH AND SONS

CRL.RP/1075/2022 · 2025-07-25

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28595 CRL.RP No. 1075 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 1084 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 1093 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 1075 OF 2022 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 1084 OF 2022 & CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 1093 OF 2022 IN CRL.RP No. 1075/2022 BETWEEN: MR. RAJA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, PROP. M/s. SRI GANESH INDUSTRIES BEEDUBETTU, VALPADY VILLAGE AND POST VAI. SHIRTHADI, MOODBIDRI MANGALORE TALUK - 574 236. NOW RESIDING AT “MATHRUSHREE” PADYAR BAMMADKA, BELVAI POST MANGALORE TALUK - 574 213. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. N SHWETHA NAYAK, ADVOCATE SRI DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: M/s BOLA RAGAVENDRA KAMATH AND SONS KUKKUDOOR - 576 117 KARKALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR.BOLA ANNAPPA KAMATH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28595 CRL.RP No. 1075 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 1084 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 1093 of 2022 S/O BOLA RAMANATH KAMATH R/AT SALMARA, KARKALA TALUK. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PRASANNA K, ADVOCATE FOR SRI CHANDRANATH ARIGA K, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.06.2022 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT UDUPI IN CRL.A.No.64/2020 ALSO THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.10.2020 IN C.C.No.185/2016 PASSED ON BY PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KARKALA. IN CRL.RP No. 1084/2022 BETWEEN: MR RAJA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS PROP. M/S SRI GANESH INDUSTRIES BEEDUBETTU, VALPADY VILLAGE AND POST VAI SHIRTHADI MOODBIDRI MANGALORE TALUK – 574 236. NOW RESIDING AT “MATHRUSHREE” PADYAR, BAMMADKA, BELVAI POST MANGALORE TALUK – 574 213. ...PETITIONER (BY SMT. N SHWETHA NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR SRI DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: M/s BOLA RAGAVENDRA KAMATHA AND SONS KUKKUDOOR - 576117, KARKALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR. BOLA ANNAPPA KAMATH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28595 CRL.RP No. 1075 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 1084 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 1093 of 2022 S/O BOLA RAMANATH KAMATH R/AT SALMARA, KARKALA TALUK. ...RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PRASANNA K, ADVOCATE FOR SRI CHANDRANATH ARIGA K, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.06.2022 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI IN CRL.A.No.65/2020 ALSO THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.10.2020 IN C.C.No.187/2016 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KARKALA. IN CRL.RP No. 1093/2022 BETWEEN: MR RAJA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS PROP. M/s SRI GANESH INDUSTRIES BEEDUBETTU, VALPADY VILLAGE AND POST VAI SHIRTHADI MOODBIDRI MANGALORE TALUK – 574 236. NOW RESIDING AT “MATHRUSHREE” PADYAR, BAMMADKA, BELVAI POST MANGALORE TALUK – 574 213. ...PETITIONER (BY SMT. N SHWETHA NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR SRI DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: M/s BOLA RAGAVENDRA KAMATHA AND SONS KUKKUDOOR – 576117, KARKALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR. BOLA ANNAPPA KAMATH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O BOLA RAMANATH KAMATH R/AT SALMARA, KARKALA TALUK. ...RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PRASANNA K, ADVOCATE FOR SRI CHANDRANATH ARIGA K, ADVOCATE) - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28595 CRL.RP No. 1075 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 1084 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 1093 of 2022 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET SIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.06.2022 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI IN CRL.A.No.63/2020 AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.10.2020 IN C.C.No.186/2016 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KARKALA. THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Petitioner and his counsel present. Respondent’s authorized representative and counsel for respondent present. 2. Joint memo for settlement is filed and it is jointly signed by the petitioner, respondent’s authorized representative and their respective counsels. Along with the joint memo, copy of authorization letter dated 22.07.2025 is enclosed with. 3. As per the terms of joint memo, all the three matters are settled for Rs.4,50,000/-. The petitioner has agreed to pay Rs.1,50,000/- on or before 23.08.2025 and - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28595 CRL.RP No. 1075 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 1084 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 1093 of 2022 balance of Rs.3,00,000/- on or before 30.10.2025. Respondent has agreed for the above terms. 4. In view of the above settlement offence under Section 138 of the N.I.Act in all the three cases is compounded. In view of compounding, all three criminal revision petitions are disposed of as offence compounded. If the petitioner fails to pay the settlement amount as agreed within time, the trial Court judgment in all the three cases will revive. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21