Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7773 (CHH)

HEERA LAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/826/2025 · 2025-02-10

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 4 2025:CGHC:7181 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 826 of 2025 1 - Heera Lal S/o Late Chaituram Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Mitgai Tahsil Ramanujganj District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 – Collector, Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 4 – Tahsildar, Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 5 - Amardev S/o Manikawa R/o Village- Mitgai, Tahsil- Ramanujganj, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - Indradev S/o Manikawa R/o Village- Mitgai, Tahsil - Ramanujganj, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 2 / 4 7 - Mu. Halakniya S/o Manikawa R/o Village- Mitgai, Tahsil - Ramanujganj, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 8 - Bhairo S/o Deendayal R/o Village- Mitgai, Tahsil - Ramanujganj, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 9 - Ramdas S/o Deendayal R/o Village- Mitgai, Tahsil - Ramanujganj, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. R. L. Rajak, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 10/02/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking for the following reliefs:- 10.1. That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned respondent authorities particular respondent No.2 and 4 to decide pending application for correction of the land in the revenue record within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.2. Any other relief, which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted an application for correction of his name in the office of Respondent authorities, however, no order has been passed till date. He submits that upon verification, it came to the knowledge of the petitioner that, no proceedings have been initiated by the Respondent. He contended that the application of the petitioner is 3 / 4 pending since a long peirod and, therefore, a direction be issued to the Respondent authorities to initiate the proceedings with respect to the application submitted by the petitioner and to conclude the proceedings expeditiously, preferably within specified time. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondent/State submits that he has verified the fact pleaded in the application from the concerned authority and as per the information received, the application submitted by the petitioner is not found in his office. He submits that if petitioner submits afresh application, it will be considered in accordance with law at the earliest. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the records enclosed along with the writ petition. 5. Annexure P/1 is an application filed by the petitioner for correction of his name in the revenue records of the land description of which is mentioned therein. Annexure P/1 also bears the receipt/seal of the respondent. However, in view of the submissions made by the counsel for the Respondent/State, the petitioner is permitted to file fresh duly constituted application before the concerned authority for correction of his name and if such an application is submitted by the petitioner to the concerned authority, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 04 months from the date of receipt of the application submitted by the petitioner. It is made clear that this Court has not 4 / 4 made any observation on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. It is for the concerned authority to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and on its own merits. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar