Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77722 (KAR)

SMT. KEMPAMMA v. ICICI LOMBARD MOTOR INS. CO. LTD.

MFA/6477/2022 · 2025-07-10

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI & SMT. D SUDHA, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 6477/2022 (MV- I) (Lok Adalat No.6284/2025) BETWEEN 1 . SMT. KEMPAMMA W/O LATE PUTTASHAMBU @ CHIKKARAJU, AGED 36 YEARS, 2 . PRAJVAL K. P., S/O LATE PUTTASHAMBU @ CHIKKARAJU, AGED 21 YEARS, 3 . PRIYANKA K. P., D/O LATE PUTTASHAMBU @ CHIKKARAJU, AGED 19 YEARS, 4 . SHAMBU GOWDA S/O LATE KADEGOWDA, AGED 69 YEARS, 5 . GOWRAMMA W/O SHAMBU GOWDA, AGED 63 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT KOTEKOPPAHALLI, UYYAMBALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, 2 RAMANAGARA DIST - 562 117 PRESENTLY R/AT NO.63, BACCHAPPA BUILDING, DODDAKALLASANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 062. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI.PRAKASH M. H., ADVOCATE) AND 1 . ICICI LOMBARD MOTOR INS. CO. LTD., OFFICE AT NO.121, THE ESTATE BUILDING, 9TH FLOOR, DICKSON ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001, REP. BY ITS MANAGER. 2 . SRI SELVA KUMAR S. B., S/O BALARAJ, MAJOR, R/AT NO.54/1, ARADHANA BAKERY BUILDING, B. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560 048. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B. C. SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 IS D/W) THIS MFA ISD FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 21.05.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO. 3827/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE 12TH ADDITIONAL JUDGE AND ACMM, SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, BENGALURU (SCCH-8), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant/s - Claimant/s is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/s/-claimant/s (being authorized by the appellant/s/-claimant/s to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant/s-claimant/s has/have agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump- sum of Rs.7,20,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Twenty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 4 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- Judge Sd/- MEMBER AMM