p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 943 of 2025 Chaiti Majhi …. Petitioner Mr. Akash Kumar Pattajoshi, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Kalahandi 3. The Tahasildar, Kalahandi …. Opposite Parties Mr. Jateswar Nayak, AGA CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO Order No. ORDER 02.04.2025 01. (Through Hybrid mode) 1. This application has been filed challenging the order dated 21.09.2024 passed by the opposite party no.3-Tahasildar, Kalahandi dismissing Mutation Case No. 5904 of 2023 filed by the petitioner. 2. At the very outset, Mr. Jateswar Nayak, learned Additional Government Advocate submits that in view of the Rule 92 of the Odisha Mutation Manual, alternative remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order. 3. Without going into the merits of the case of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the appropriate authority. p. 2 4. It is further directed that if the appeal is filed along with an application for condonation of delay within a period of two weeks, the same shall be considered in accordance with law by the appellate authority. (Savitri Ratho) Judge puspa Designation: Personal Assistant